1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 |
During the investigation, C1 provided an account of the reported incident involving S1. C2 also provided information indicating that an incident occurred involving C1's drawing. S1 denied engaging in the alleged conduct. S2 and S3 stated they did not witness the reported incident.
On September 24, 2026, LPA conducted a telephone interview with P1 regarding the reported incident. P1 stated that on September 2, 2026, while driving home after picking up C1 from school, C1 disclosed that S1 had screamed at her, grabbed her arm below the elbow, and damaged her drawing before throwing it in the trash. P1 stated that C1 demonstrated where and how S1 allegedly grabbed or hit her arm.
P1 reported that C1 was primarily upset about her drawing being damaged, being grabbed, and being screamed at. P1 stated that C1 wanted her to speak with the D1 regarding the incident. P1 further stated that she did not observe any redness, bruising, swelling, marks, or other visible injuries to C1's arm, and C1 did not complain of pain or discomfort. No photographs were taken.
P1 additionally reported that approximately two weeks before the incident, C1 had expressed reluctance to attend school and stated that S1 had screamed at her on a previous occasion. However, C1 did not provide P1 with additional details regarding that occurrence. P1 confirmed that she notified the facility of the September 2, 2026, incident by email that evening.
Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and information obtained during the investigation, LPA was unable to establish sufficient evidence to determine that S1 engaged in the alleged conduct. Although C1 reported that S1 grabbed or hit her arm, screamed at her, and damaged her drawing, S1 denied the allegations, and S2 and S3 reported that they did not witness the incident. P1 did not observe any visible injury to C1's arm.
Page 2
|