1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 08/25/2026, 08/27/2026 and 09/01/2026, LPA received copies of evidence pertinent to the investigation from RP, at which time additional allegations were also received from the RP. On 08/28/2026 LPA conducted an unannounced visit to the CCC to conduct confidential interviews, took observations and collected evidence pertinent to the investigation which included photographic evidence and communication records. On 09/01/2026 LPA received copies of evidence pertinent to the investigation from the CCC. On 09/04/2026 LPA conducted a follow up, unannounced visit to the CCC at which time additional staff interviews were conducted, observations made and copies of evidence collected which included communication records and photographic evidence.
Regarding the allegation Child sustained an unexplained injury due to staff neglect. On 08/21/26, 08/28/26, and 09/04/26 LPA Gerth conducted interviews with staff. During the interview process, 6/6 staff interviews corroborated that they did not observe the child referenced in the complaint to have any incidents which caused a lip injury on 08/03/26 nor did they observe the child with the lip injury while in care on 08/03/2026. Photo evidence provided by the CCC to LPA during the investigation, were taken of the child while in care on 08/03/2026 and no injury to the lip can be seen in the photos, but a small marking can be observed on the lip in the photos taken 08/04/2026. Interviews with 6/6 staff further corroborate that the receiving staff member the morning of 08/04/2026, brought the lip marking to the attention of the RP when conducting the daily visual health check upon a child’s arrival and a lip marking had not been observed by staff until that point. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted, observations made, and evidence gathered, LPA did not find a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation Staff did not allow day care child to use the restroom due to inadequate staffing. During the investigation, LPA conducted unannounced visits on 08/14/2026, 08/21/2026, 08/28/2026 and 09/04/2026. During each visit, LPA confirmed that classrooms were in ratio, with staff qualified for their respective positions. Evidence received from the CCC on 08/21/2026 support on the date and time of the alleged incident that the classroom was staffed in accordance with Title 22 regulation and in ratio, with additional staff available and present. LPA did not find a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation Staff inappropriately disciplines day care children. During the investigation, LPA conducted confidential interviews with Staff on 08/21/26, 08/28/26 and 09/04/26. LPA conducted an interview with the Reporting Party on 08/24/26. LPA collected evidence pertinent to the investigation, including staffing schedules, parent enrollment forms, parent handbook and communication records. |