1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | received.Facility staff interviewed did not report observing an incident involving inappropriate handling or other physical interaction that would explain the reported marks.
Available records reviewed during the investigation did not identify a specific incident or establish when or how the marks occurred. Interviews with other relevant parties did not reveal corroborating information to support the allegation. Although marks were reported after the child left the facility, the information obtained during the investigation did not establish that the marks were caused by facility staff or resulted from inappropriate handling while the child was in care.
Based on interviews, record review, and information obtained during the investigation, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with the facility representative, Bertha Tapia. A copy of this report was provided, and appeal rights were discussed and provided. |