1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed staff S1-S2 on 9/22/23 and 11/17/23. LPA addressed the allegation and S1 stated that they were not aware of any children that have been injured or sustained any bruising. S2 stated that they were aware of a child (C1) who had sustained a bruise but did not observe any bruises or marks while in care. S1 stated that if a child gets hurt then licensee will communicate with the parents. S2 stated that if a child gets hurt then they can document on the Brightwheel app and parents receive a notification.
LPA interviewed parents (P1-P6) on 9/21/23, 10/27/23 and 11/21/23. LPA addressed the allegation with parents, 1 of 6 parents stated that their child sustained a bruise. P1 stated that the noticed that C1 had a bruise on their arm when they picked C1 from child care. P1 stated that they asked the licensee what happened and the licensee did not know anything about the bruise on C1’s arm and licensee’s assistant also did not know anything about the bruise. P1 stated that they did not receive a incident report for C1’s bruise.
LPA interviewed children (C1-C4) on 9/22/23 and 10/16/23 only 2 of 4 children were able to be interviewed by LPA. C2 stated that they saw their friend C1 fall down one time. C2 stated they saw C1 fall down one time but did not cry. C3 stated that they fell down on their elbow but did not break any bones. C3 stated that they did not see C1 fall and get hurt.
During today’s visit facility was toured. LPA observed 0 children in care.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. |