West Kingsland Kindercare
Inspection history
Source: Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Child Care RegulationRecords held from Sep 1, 2021 onward. Earlier visits may exist in the agency’s own files.
| Date | Kind | Outcome as recorded | Violations | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jul 14, 2026 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 1 | Agency record |
| Jun 3, 2026 | Report | Deficiencies cited | 2 | Agency record |
| Apr 14, 2026 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Apr 9, 2026 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 1 | Agency record |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Mar 18, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Mar 13, 2025 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 1 | Agency record |
| Feb 7, 2025 | Report | Deficiencies cited | 1 | Agency record |
| Jun 7, 2024 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Sep 26, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Sep 23, 2023 | Report | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jun 9, 2023 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 6 | Agency record |
| Dec 5, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Nov 28, 2022 | Report | Deficiencies cited | 2 | Agency record |
| Jun 28, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jun 27, 2022 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 5 | Agency record |
| Feb 7, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jan 14, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jan 13, 2022 | Report | Deficiencies cited | 1 | Agency record |
| Dec 17, 2021 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Dec 15, 2021 | Report | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
Violations
Text reproduced verbatim · Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Child Care RegulationNearly every licensed provider accumulates some. A missing signature and an unlocked medicine cabinet are both “violations”, and they are not the same thing. Look at the class, the pattern over time and how quickly it was corrected — not the count alone.
Class is our grouping of the state’s own weights, reviewed per state. The agency’s own label is always shown beside it.
“A caregiver did not know the number of children. The caregiver stated there were 18 children in care and a total of 21 children were present in the classroom.”
“Based upon the information obtained from the DFPS Investigation, there was sufficient evidence to support a child was grabbed while in care.”
“Based upon the information obtained from the DFPS Investigation, there was sufficient evidence to support records were not accessible upon request.”
“A caregiver was observed alone with children without having an eligible background check.”
“An infant was observed swaddled in the crib during the inspection.”
“Based upon the information obtained from the DFPS Investigation, there was sufficient evidence to support a child was restrained in a highchair.”
“Three caregivers who did not have background checks were present at the operation and had access to children in care in the infant A, school age, and Pre-K classrooms.”
“In the Infant A and Infant B classrooms, the diaper changing supplies were in an unlocked cabinet accessible to children.”
“In the infant B classroom, multiple bottles/sippy cups were not labeled with the children's names. Note: Corrected when the bottles were labeled by the caregiver.”
“A child with a known food allergy does not have a plan on file for review.”
“Two transportation vehicles used to transport children had first aid kits that were missing the following items: Vehicle 1- missing scissors, tweezers, thermometer, tape and gauze. Vehicle 2- missing thermometer and tweezers. Note: Corrected when the missing items were added to the first aid kits.”
“Four out of ten employee files reviewed were missing a high school diploma or equivalent.”
“During this investigation, it was determined the operation did not notify parents of children enrolled about two communicable diseases within 48 hours of being made aware. The child's parent informed the operation that their child had pink eye (conjunctivitis) and hands, foot, and mouth disease. Note: The Director sent a notification to parents of children in the classroom where the child with the communicable diseases was present.”
“During this investigation, it was determined the operation allowed a child to return to school without a doctor's note after being notified by the child's parent that the child had two communicable diseases (pink eye and hand, foot, and mouth) during different time frames. Note: The child is no longer enrolled at the operation. The de-enrollment date was on 11/28/2022.”
“The sink children use for hand washing and a toilet in the school age classroom needs repair. The sink is stopped up and is overflowing and 1 of 2 toilets are out of order.”
“The operation does not have a current employee list posted as required. Note: The Director created a current staff list and posted it during the inspection.”
“The operation has not certified annually the children's product safety website to view any recalled items. Note: The Director reviewed the list and certified by using form 2885 during the inspection.”
“A caregiver in the infant room (2m to 13m) did not state the correct number of children present. The caregiver stated there were 8 children but 9 children were present in the classroom,”
“There is no documentation lock down drills are practiced at least four times a year.”
“Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver administered prohibited discipline to a child in care. As of completion of the investigation the employee was immediately terminated.”